March
21, 2013, and I have been back home for almost a week, after spending two weeks
in India. For those of you who have been
reading my posts from the outset, yes, this is somewhat earlier than
planned. To my Thai friends who are
likely laughing at me, no, it was not the heat that chased me away. Nor was it the lack of ice for my drinks,
which would likely have all of you heading back to Thailand within a week. My son became ill, so it was wise of us to
leave, but I was not sad to have to make this decision. And my lack of regret about this stemmed not
from discomfort from heat or lack of cold drinks, but from a source far more
subtle, and more meaningful. It stemmed,
I think, from finding myself in an environment where I did not feel safe, in an
arena where an aura of hopelessness prevailed, and in a society where one of
the most basic assumptions of my society, that of a general concern of the
citizens, and government, for the care and well-being of the other members of
that society, was not necessarily valid.
We
started our visit to India in Mumbai and one of the first things that struck me
about this city as we drove towards our hotel was the decrepit nature of the
areas through which we were driving. Buildings
looked as if they had been bombed, even though this was not a war zone. Hollow-shelled multi-story buildings with
missing sides were rampant and there were piles of collapsed building materials
lining the streets. One and two storey structures looked as though they were
about to collapse and were pocketed with holes, even though there were plenty
of materials readily available for their repair. An aura of destitution prevailed, an
impression of a certain lack of concern, and lack of pride, with the living
environment. Although I was not in the
most well to do areas of Mumbai and the other cities I visited I was not in the
slums either, this lack of care was not necessary. I have been to many other places where poverty
is part of the status quo and have witnessed that this does not equate the lack
of pride of possession demonstrated here.
That being said, there often is at least some degree of a lack of pride
of possession demonstrated somewhere in most larger cities, however, typically
this is isolated to specific, relatively small, areas which can be
avoided. In India it was the opposite,
with the areas of neglect being the status quo, and areas reflecting pride of
ownership or possession being the minority.
The
impression of a lack of care for, well, anything, extended beyond
buildings. People seemed to care little
for each other also. Any interactions
involving an individual wanting something, and something else possibly being in
the way, involved competition. People
would literally push other people out of the way to get in front of them in
“line”. Non-human obstructions, such as
inanimate objects and animals, were routinely kicked out of the way, perhaps
because they are typically shorter and more in foot range than hand range. With regards to interacting with each other,
in general people would not offer assistance to others unless there was something
in it for them, and there was a strong expectation of payment for any
assistance that was rendered, no matter how minor, and regardless of whether or
not said assistance was solicited. The
most basic example of this of course is the expectation of payment to the women
who hang around the washrooms informing patrons where items such as the water
for washing are located. My son made the
mistake of not fulfilling this expectation one time, resulting in a very irate
woman waving her broom at him as he hurriedly walked away towards me, in quite
a state of confusion. My impression of the
“only for myself” orientation does not result solely from irritation at
constantly being expected to pay for minor little niceties of human interaction though,
it is well acknowledged by the locals that one of the more counter-productive
approaches to interacting with an individual from whom one requires something
is to try to plead your case on the basis of need as this will result in an “it’s
not my problem” response and is fairly guaranteed to, at best, lengthen, and at
worst, completely obstruct, whatever it is you are trying to accomplish. This I did also witness, between Indian
residents, as I was myself waiting very patiently, and unpleadingly, for my
request to be evaluated….
The
lack of care for possessions extended beyond the decrepit nature of the more
public buildings to the possessions and businesses of the individuals. As I mentioned, I have travelled to other
places populated by people who do not have much; this does not prevent them
from exhibiting care for what they have.
The products in their roadside stalls are nicely laid out, and handled
with care. Their shacks are clean, their
footwear nicely lined up. This was not
the case in India. The market products
were more often than not displayed in a large jumble. The products themselves were not transported
or moved with care, I saw several times products, including food products,
being unceremoniously dumped out of one container onto the ground, and then
tossed into the next location, a process which undoubtedly was part of the
cause of the poor state of the product.
In Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, other places I have visited where
people make do with more primitive accommodations, those accommodations still
somehow exhibited a sense of pride of ownership…. they were whole, one could
tell the leaves or other material on the roof were replaced as needed, there were
no collapsed building materials next to buildings which could use those
materials to shore up the collapsing walls or roof under which the inhabitants
were living. This was not the case in
India. I did not enter any of these
dwellings while I was in India, so perhaps the care or pride of possession
which is so important for human progress is demonstrated there instead of on
the outside, but when one sees countless and repeated instances of living
accommodations which are falling apart, which are not whole, when there are
materials lying about which could accomplish this right there, there is an
impression received of a certain lack of ownership on the part of the
inhabitants.
In
addition to the rather depressing pervasive air of a lack of concern with their
environment and with each other, and perhaps resulting at least in part from
this attitude, I felt distinct concern about my safety. It is rather ironic that in the week I have
been home there have been several articles in the Times of India relating to
just this aspect of Indian society…… India shocked by another gang rape, this time a Swiss tourist, UK tourist jumps from hotel to escape sexual assault, however, my concerns
weren’t necessarily related solely to a danger of being raped, or resulting
from a concern that I would be singled out because I was a foreigner. I simply, in general, felt that it was not
safe for a female to be out and about on their own. Period.
I have been to many places in Canada and the United States, to Rome,
Cambodia, Vietnam, Thailand, Mexico, Costa Rica, Jamaica, and in all of these places I
have felt that generally it is not irresponsible of me to think that I can go
out and take a look around on my own without running a substantial risk to my
safety. This was not the case in
India. In some places, such as the
tourist area of Udaipur when it was daytime and crowded, or along the main,
extremely busy, street by our hotel in Mumbai, again when it was daytime and
very busy, I felt as though I could wander around with relatively low levels of
sensitivity for safety, not because others would look out for me but because everyone is so distracted they don't have the time or attention to devote to mounting an actual attack. But wandering
one street down? No. So in general, in India, I felt that I was
not safe, whereas in other places I have had the impression that I generally am
safe, provided I stay out of “bad” areas.
Furthermore, in other places I have been, I have felt that for the most
part I can ask somebody for help and provided I don’t choose to ask someone who
appears as though they are on the edges of society it is most likely that they
will try to help me. In India I
distinctly felt that I was putting myself in more danger asking for help than I
would be in if I were to remain in an anonymous state of needing help. What is it that made me feel this way? It is hard to say, but I know of a couple of
factors that likely contributed….
First
is the low status of women. An observant
or sensitive person can feel this, it is quite pervasive. I was somewhat uncomfortable being on my own
in an environment where my concerns and state of being were not considered to
be of value. And I was on my own. I saw virtually no women in the public areas
during my time in India, so the usual advice for women travelling to countries
with male/female interaction restrictions, of solicit help and information from the females,
was not applicable. With regards to
soliciting aid from a male, well, since males are the primary source of the
danger to females in India, the wisdom of this approach was questionable. Not to mention the societal taboos against a
female initiating contact with an unknown male, and the messages doing so would
therefore send.
Next,
and perhaps because of this low status, women appear to be routinely attacked
in this society, and this does not appear to generate much concern in the
overall populace. Why do I say this? First
off because the attacks are so commonplace, and secondly because when such
things are written up in the news the focus is on the oddity of the victim or
victim’s family reporting or objecting to the event, not on the event itself,
implying that it is the objecting, not the attack, that is newsworthy. So here you have an environment where women,
even the local women, are not considered of value, are routinely victimised, and
where there is little concern exhibited over this victimisation. Not good, especially when one has no local
resources.
One
solution of course would have been for me to follow the lead of the local women
and disappear from the public environment.
However, this is not how I wanted to spend the next three months of my time,
hiding in a house, restricted in my ability to live. I commend all of those who are in India, both
Indians and foreigners, working ever so hard for the freedom of this society, but
this was not how I wanted to have my son and I spend the next few months of our
lives, regardless of the value of the work we would have been doing. So I made the decision to leave, and come
back to my home where everyone is considered to be of value, and everyone
experiences at least relatively equal levels of security.
Once
I had made this decision I discovered yet another bothersome aspect of Indian
society, that of restriction to my freedom of movement. I had entered India on a volunteer Visa which
had stamped onto it that I was required to register with the appropriate
government agency in the region where I was going to be volunteering within 14
days of arrival in India. By the time I
arrived in my volunteering region, approximately one and a half weeks after
arrival in India, I had decided I was going to leave. It was then that I discovered that before I
would be permitted to leave I needed to register and then de-register with the
government office in my region of volunteering so that I would have the
appropriate permission to leave form.
Without this form I would not be allowed to leave the country. What a frightening thought, if I had decided
to leave at the point where my son started becoming ill, without making the
trek up to the volunteering location so that I could at least meet the people I
had been in correspondence with, I would have been turned back at passport
control. I would have been stuck in this
country, helpless and without recourse.
I am very happy to have avoided that experience. The experience I did have was to have to make
the trek down to the passport office to fill out multitudes of forms, leave and
do repeated photocopying, return, wait, fill out more forms, etc. etc. I was quite fortunate, it was all done in an
afternoon, but apparently this is rather unusual and the process can take
several days. Somebody was looking after
me I think.
So
that was my experience in India. It was
a valuable experience, if not exactly what I was expecting. I learned about
some of the basic assumptions of my society which are central to my being, such
as the assumption of a general concern of the citizens for each other, a pride
of self of the majority of the citizens, and respect for the freedoms and
dignity of each and every member of the society. I have experienced to a small degree what
life is like without these assumptions, and have a far better understanding of
others’ situations than I did before, or would be able to attain without this
or a similar experience. I am thankful
that I was able to obtain this experience without significant consequences. I am also thankful that there are people in India who think differently than the general impressions I received, people who, for instance, will help a mother and son standing alone at a train station find their loading area, and remain close by until said mother and son's train arrives and the two of them are safely aboard, individuals such as those at Sambhali Trust who are dedicating the whole of their lives to improving the situation, and others who I did not encounter but who surely exist. I am thankful there are people from other countries with better home situations who are willing to travel to India and sacrifice their time and freedoms to demonstrate another way. There is hope, even if not everyone recognizes it. But for me, I am now quite happy to relax into a society where I am considered to be a
person and have the general rights associated with this. It was nice the other day going to the grocery store knowing I was not risking my sanctity by doing so and that if I were to
suddenly require assistance for some reason chances were that the person next to me,
male or female, would offer it to me...
No comments:
Post a Comment